-
-

Site Meter
-
-
   The financial consequences of divorce can be staggering.
   Those who have been married for less than 15 to 20 years may very well escape having to pay any spousal support but child support
will be mandetory based on the number of minor children.
   At any rate, those whose ages ranges from 20 to 40 will probably not have to pay alimony.  First of all, the law recognizes that most people are still young enough at those ages to develop their own career and, secondly, those who have been married longer are deemed to be more responsible for the welfare of the mate who makes the lesser income.
    Regardless of what anyone might say, those standards are just.  An individual who is still young enough to gain the knowledge and experience needed to produce an income should not have the right to financially penalize an ex-mate.  Conversely, a woman in her mid-fifties should not be expected to live in poverty because her marriage to a husband, who was the breadwinner, was legally disolved.-
    Furthermore, it is equally true that the court systems can be somewhat unjust when it comes to the specific monetary awards to the ex-mate of many years who has the lesser income.  However, the supporting party has the right to contest such judgements and any supporting evidence can indeed change the amount specified in the court order.  Nevertheless, it is indeed fair that a long-term relationship that ends in divorce should be one where both parties share the liabilities and assets equally.  The factor of age is a fair standard despite the frustration of those whose self-centeredness would wish a mate of many years to suffer while they go on to live free of any liability to provide for the basic needs of someone who was loved for so long.
   On the other hand, a needy ex-mate who makes unfair demands upon the supporting party is just as wrong for being unreasonable.  Somewhere in the mix of all of the rangling and haggling that takes place through any divorce proceeding, there is a reasonable point of fairness where both parties will be able to deal with the financial consequences.  Regardless of what anyone who has ever been divorced would tell you, the courts are generally fair and just in their approach to financial settlements for the purpose of securing a divorce order.
-
-
   It comes down to this...
   What price are you willing to pay to gain your freedom?
   Having personally been through the divorce mill, I have come to some conclusions based on my own experience.
    As a result, I am convinced that some very unhappily married people stay confined within those relationships because, frankly, they refuse to face the horrid financial losses that a divorce is sure to cause.  They would rather sacrifice their basic human need for true love just so that they can keep their home, their gadgets, and their 401K plan.  Conversely, I am equally convinced that those who do opt to legally end their marriages have no idea how much it is going to cut into their bank accounts. 
   Besides the expected attorney fees (between $75.00 and $100.00 an hour), there is child support, spousal support, court costs (perhaps even for the other person), paying off old debts, your current living expenses, and any number of other costs that the court deems reasonable.
   Getting a divorce is a very expensive undertaking.  Rarely do those who decide to go through with it actually understand all that it will entail.-
    That being said, I again must tell you that, in my case, it was worth it all.  You see, no one can put a price on personal freedom just as no one can quantify the loyalty of a mate who has spent most of his/her life in a legal relationship with you.  Both share equal merit.  She who gave so much of her life as my mate, bore me a family full of wonderful children, and supported me through the many challenges of life for so long deserves what I have been ordered to pay out everytime my employer cuts me a paycheck.  There is no doubt about that.
    However, regardless of the lowering of my standard of living, one factor overshadows all of this.
    I am free!
-
-
    Having weighed out the choices between staying with someone whose lifeviews had become so much more narrow, while mine expanded due to the experiences of life, I found myself being suffocated.  Regardless of the final death throws of our relationship, the sure knowledge that there was little left of love between us forced me to consider the probability of financeial stress as compared to remaining in a relationship that had become so flat lined.  She never saw it that way.  I felt it for years and, regardless of my begging for her to understand, she remained oblivious.  As a result, I ended up financially strapped and emotionally wiped.  Nevertheless, escaping the many years of settling for a mundane relationship has proven to be well worth it all.
    Today, I am a free man.  In fact, I will never forget that last court appearance where we agreed to a settlement in front of the presiding judge.  As my attorney and I entered the hallway outside of the courtroom, my soon-to-be ex-wife's attorney greeted me with a warm handshake and, while looking up at my lawyer, simply and honestly stated, "Let's give these two people their freedom!"
    By the time when the judge signed the final decree of divorcement, I found myself financially starting over again in my early fifties. Yet, it was a day of liberation and rejoicing that, finally, I was free to find true love again--filled with hope in the future and a soulful faith that there is indeed life after divorce.
    The bottom line is this...
    You can either stay within the confines of an unhappy marriage while holding on to your assets or you can strike out for freedom and end up with a list of liabilities.  When it comes to divorce, few people manage to have their cake and eat it, too. 
    Obviously, many choose to remain married to someone they no longer truly love.  As for me, I came to the decision that it is better to spend the last third of my life with someone whom I deeply love regardless of my financial circumstances.  Not everyone shares those same values.  Yet, I was forced to make that decision and did so with much thought and reflection upon all that it meant and involved.
    Yes, I lost much in the way of material belongings.  On the other hand, I found myself.
    As difficult as it was, I would not go back for all the gold in Fort Knox.
    I am free and no one can put a price on that.
    Not her.  Not my children.  Not me.
    I am free!
© all rights reserved - 10/22/2001----
-
--
Romanceopedia
Site Key Word Search

-
-
Site Information.....
-
 Let's Link
 Banners & Buttons
 Suggest a Site
-
 Awards Gallery
 Apply for Our Award
 Contact Vincent
-

   The mission of this not-for-profit website is to promote clear insights and toleration regarding the many variations of primary relationships that exist in our world.  We ask for neither acceptance or approval but hope that each visitor who reviews the pages of this site will leave them with a better understanding of the numerous cultural, historical, preferential, religious, sexual, and sociological approaches to coupling that have always existed and will continue to exist as long as there are at least two human beings living on this planet.  If the effort put into creating and maintaining this site results in others coming to the realization that the basic human need to love and be loved takes on many forms which are accepted by those who practice them, whether right or wrong as determined by the personal belief system of others, then it will have served it's purpose well.
-
-